Why This Topic Matters
What it is
Five sentences are given; four combine into one coherent paragraph and one does not belong. You enter the number of the odd one — TITA, no negative marking.
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Avg/slot | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odd Sentence Out questions | 0.7 | – | 2.0 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Skipped in 2022 — back with weight since. After vanishing in 2022, odd-sentence-out returned at about 2 per slot in 2023 and 2025 (~1 per slot in 2024). Treat it as a current fixture, not a legacy type. Like para-jumble it is TITA: never leave it blank.
The odd sentence is rarely off-topic in an obvious way. It is usually on the same broad subject but pulls in a different direction — a specific instance among generalities, a definition among narration, or a contrasting frame.
The method
- Find the theme of the majority. Skim for the topic and the angle the four shared sentences take on it.
- Build the paragraph. Chain the sentences that link (pronouns, connectors, a continuous line of thought).
- The leftover is the answer. The sentence that won't slot into that chain — or that changes the type of statement — is the intruder.
A worked example
1. Coral reefs are among the most biologically rich ecosystems on Earth. 2. They occupy less than one percent of the ocean floor yet shelter a quarter of all marine species. 3. Warming seas are now bleaching many reefs faster than they can recover. 4. The Great Barrier Reef stretches more than two thousand kilometres along Australia's coast. 5. This concentration of life makes their decline a loss out of all proportion to their size.
Reasoning. Sentences 1 → 2 → 5 → 3 form one argument: reefs are biologically rich (1); tiny in area but huge in species share (2); this concentration makes their loss outsized (5, picking up "a quarter of all species"); and they are indeed being lost to warming (3). Sentence 4 states a geographic fact about one reef's length — a different kind of claim that the richness-and-threat argument never needs.
Answer: 4.
The tell: the intruder usually has no inbound or outbound link — no other sentence refers to it, and it refers to no other sentence. If every sentence seems linked, you've built the wrong four; try a different chain.
Common traps
Topic vs angle. All five sentences often share a topic — PFAS chemicals, one comedian, freedom — so "same subject" proves nothing. The intruder breaks the angle: four explain a mechanism while one gives a history; four describe the show while one reviews its reception. Ask not "is this about the same thing?" but "is this doing the same job?"
- Picking the hardest sentence. Difficulty ≠ irrelevance. Judge by fit, not by which sentence you understood least.
- Forcing a five-link chain. If your paragraph needs the odd sentence to make sense, you've mis-built it — try a different four.
Checklist
- State the shared theme and angle of the majority
- Chain the four that link by reference or idea
- Confirm the leftover has no link in or out
- Re-read the four as a paragraph — it should be seamless without the fifth
- TITA — always enter an answer
Sample Questions
17 practice questions
Sign in for full access
Create a free account to access all 17 practice questions on this topic.
CAT PYQ Spotlight
Actual CAT questions on this topic
Sign in for full access
Create a free account to access all 8 CAT PYQs on this topic.
Continue Your Prep